In what situation is a coal mine operator not considered to be in control?

In the context of Queensland mining law, a coal mine operator is typically considered to be in control when they possess the authority and capabilities to manage the mine effectively. This involves overseeing operations, managing resources, and ensuring compliance with regulatory obligations.

The answer highlighting that an operator is not considered to be in control when they can transfer resources to another part of the mine is apt because control implies a direct authority over the mine's operations rather than the ability to redistribute resources internally. The control assessment often hinges on the operator's ability to manage and direct the overall activities and safety protocols of the mine.

Being able to transfer resources may reflect operational flexibility but does not inherently indicate control over the mine itself. The essence of control implies comprehensive oversight and responsibility rather than simply a transactional capacity regarding resources.

In relation to the other scenarios, being able to control the supply of services or having a general management role in another mine indicates a level of operational command that aligns with being in control. Furthermore, if an operator is on leave, their absence could create gaps in oversight, but it doesn't negate their control when they are in active management mode. Thus, these situations do not accurately reflect circumstances where an operator cannot be deemed to have control.