What procedural steps should be taken when there is a disagreement about developing standard operating procedures?

Choosing to consult an expert and document agreed and disagreed matters in the face of a disagreement about developing standard operating procedures (SOPs) is the most appropriate approach. This step emphasizes the importance of utilizing external expertise to provide insight that can help clarify the disagreement and facilitate a constructive dialogue among stakeholders. Consulting an expert can introduce fresh perspectives, industry best practices, or technical knowledge that may not be available within the existing team.

Moreover, documenting both the agreed and disagreed matters is crucial, as it not only helps in keeping a record of the decision-making process but also ensures that all viewpoints are considered. This documentation can serve as a reference for future discussions and lend transparency to the process, promoting accountability among team members. Ultimately, this approach fosters collaboration and improves the quality of the SOPs developed, as diverse inputs can lead to more comprehensive and effective procedures.

The other options fail to adequately address the need for resolution and collaboration in the SOP development process. Simply recording the disagreement and proceeding without resolution does not promote effective communication or problem-solving. Allowing a single entity, such as the SSE, to make the final decision without further consultation can lead to a lack of buy-in from other stakeholders and may ignore valuable input. Lastly, abandoning the SOP development